bad chart造句

• Removing wikilinks to a bad chart just makes it more difficult to remove the references.
• Neither have been identified as bad charts and no other charts from these countries have been identified yet.
• This was immediately after 121.1 . 16.130 reinserted the list of bad charts that I had removed 2 days earlier.
• I would like to get someone interested in working on a bot so that I can move on to more fun styles of editing than being bad chart policeman.
• :He's been blocked for this before, his accounts have been blocked for this before, he's been warned multiple times, and he continues to insert bad chart information.
• No reference formatting, adding Bad charts like Portugal Charts, and digging up bad or unsourced information from article's history and adding them to articles .  "'talk "') 09 : 24, 7 March 2011 ( UTC)
• What I need here is just a friendly drive-by from someone else to make it clear that constantly inserting data from known bad charts and attempting to evade AFD results by creating shadow copies of articles isn't just a problem to one cranky editor.
• It's hard enough to try to clean these charts out of Wikipedia without having to revisit the same articles over and over because people keep trying to force bad charts into them . & mdash; talk ) 16 : 22, 29 November 2008 ( UTC)
• Normally, fresh off a block for edit-warring in bad chart information while jumping back and forth between a named account and anonymous editing followed by returning to the behaviour of edit-warring in bad chart information while jumping back and forth between a named account and anonymous editing, combined with doing so on a deletion notice, combined with doing so after a final vandalism warning would result in an instant block.
• Normally, fresh off a block for edit-warring in bad chart information while jumping back and forth between a named account and anonymous editing followed by returning to the behaviour of edit-warring in bad chart information while jumping back and forth between a named account and anonymous editing, combined with doing so on a deletion notice, combined with doing so after a final vandalism warning would result in an instant block.
• His use of bad charts has been better, with one notable exception : he has started a blog at http : / / romaniantop100 . blogspot . ro / ( see http : / / www . blogger . com / profile / 02260736934288394777 for the details of the blog owner : clearly the same person ) where he creates his own version of a defunct chart and then uses it as a source in Wikipedia articles.